What is the Open Decision Framework?

In a sense, we can say that ethics is all about making choices, and about providing reasons why we should make these choices. According to the common good approach, life in community is a good in itself and our actions should contribute to that life.

To get around this issue, a leader must listen to the experts while simultaneously welcoming novel thoughts and solutions from others. Executives at one shoe manufacturer did this by opening up the brainstorming process for new shoe styles to the entire company. As a result, a security guard submitted a design for a shoe that became one of their best sellers.

Regret-Minimization Framework

Guidance on if and when to identify, synthesize and integrate evidence on criteria other than benefits and harms of the intervention into the decision-making process was provided only for WHO-INTEGRATE . In our experience, most guideline development processes focus almost exclusively on benefits and harms in the evidence review and in discussions. Recently, however, guideline groups are examining qualitative evidence on acceptability, feasibility, and other decision criteria. Guideline groups continue to be uncertain as to how to incorporate EtD criteria such as equity, into recommendations in a meaningful fashion.

Making ethical decisions requires sensitivity to the ethical implications of problems and situations. Having a framework for ethical decision making is essential. We hope that the information above is helpful in developing your own experience in making choices. Although this framework takes into account a variety of human experience, it also makes it more difficult to resolve disputes, as there can often be more disagreement about virtuous traits than ethical actions.

Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions

Simple contexts, properly assessed, require straightforward management and monitoring. Here, leaders sense, categorize, and respond. That is, they assess the facts of the situation, decision making framework categorize them, and then base their response on established practice. Heavily process-oriented situations, such as loan payment processing, are often simple contexts.

Exclude as exclusively economic focus. Susan L Norris was contracted by the University of California, San Francisco to develop this review.

General aspects of evidence-to-decision frameworks

Other decision criteria such as values, equity, feasibility, and acceptability were variably included, while only two frameworks encompassed human rights. There was variation across frameworks in terminology, definitions and presentation of EtD criteria. The five systematic reviews of EtD frameworks describe decision criteria that were similar to those presented in the frameworks from key organizations. To identify relevant EtD frameworks, we searched Medline via PubMed for systematic reviews of EtD frameworks, templates or tools published in English and indexed in the 10-year period up to 7 January 2021. The complete search strategy is found in Annex 1. We also solicited the advice of guideline development experts for any additional potential citations.

This method involves accepting the fact that there are multiple solutions to the problem at hand. This third or new idea is a unique combination of the best parts of the original, opposing ideas. The question now is how to do this? Here is where the decision-making framework comes into application. Every decision has two sets of ideas. These ideas are almost always opposite to each other. Start a conversation with other Atlassian Team Playbook users, get support, or provide feedback.

Ethics declarations

However, the degree to which the guideline group or other decision maker addressed these additional criteria was often unclear. It was difficult to compare specific EtD criteria across frameworks due to significant variation in approaches to lumping and splitting criteria across frameworks, as well as in the terminology and definitions used. While most frameworks presented broad categories of criteria (e.g., “equity”), only WHO-INTEGRATE provides detailed sub-criteria to facilitate understanding and decision making. Some main criteria included several constructs, which can complicate the decision-making process and reporting of the rationale for the recommendation or decision. For example, WHO-INTEGRATE’s “Human rights and sociocultural acceptability” includes both human rights and what other frameworks refer to as “preferences” or “acceptability”. Ideally, EtD considerations are discussed early in the guideline development process, and strategic decisions are made as to the types of information and evidence that will be needed to inform key considerations. It may not be necessary, feasible, or even possible, to systematically examine evidence on all EtD considerations.

Before addressing a situation, leaders need to recognize which context governs it—and tailor their actions accordingly. Evidence-to-decision criteria for each key organization. Across the top of the figure, broad categories of evidence-to-decision criteria are presented. For each listed organization, the cell is shaded if their evidence-to-decision framework encompasses one or more criteria within a category. Neuroeconomics is the study of the neurobiological and computational basis of value-based decision making.

Keywords

But if a team is working together through a suggestion, Shklarski suggests writing it on a whiteboard or in a Google Doc that everyone can see and collaborate. It starts with a basic chart, with the two options you’re deciding between at the top. Down the left-hand column, you have benefits, costs, and — uniquely — mitigations. Accelerate your career with Harvard ManageMentor®. HBR Learning’s online leadership training helps you hone your skills with courses like Decision Making. Earn badges to share on LinkedIn and your resume. Access more than 40 courses trusted by Fortune 500 companies.